For weeks my sister noticed a kitten eating from a dumpster
where she lives. After crossing paths
with the kitten on numerous occasions it become clear that she was an orphan or
a stray. As a mother or a Good Samaritan
my sister began trying to get the kitten to follow her home. She felt horrible that someone neglected the
kitten in the dead of winter. A week or
so passed and the kitten finally followed my sister into her apartment. She began feeding her and providing her with
proper warmth and shelter. My sister
fell in love with the little kitten almost instantly and so did my niece and nephew. So they decided to adopt her and named her
Tiger Lilly. A couple of weeks later my
sister realized that Tiger Lilly was pregnant.
Fortunate or unfortunately she not only rescued a stray but was now
faced with the possibility of kittens. I
remember playfully laughing at her and saying something like “WOW you would be
lucky enough to rescue a pregnant kitten.”
Again my sister surprises me and decides to take on yet another duty that
someone else neglected to be responsible for.
After bringing Tiger Lilly to the vet she learned the she is in fact
pregnant with two kittens and that everything looked great and on track. At this time the office gave Tiger Lilly a
rabies vaccine. When it was time for her
to have her babies something wasn’t right.
Tiger Lilly was bleeding and crying and my sister was panicked. Something clicked in her head that something
was terribly wrong. So she decided to do
her own investigation and found that pregnant cats should not be
vaccinated. Discretely enough she called
around to other offices to ask if in fact this were true and every place that
she called confirmed that they would not vaccinate a pregnant cat. My sister learned that vaccinating a pregnant
cat could lead to mutation and or spontaneous abortion. We later learned in confidence that it’s not
uncommon for some offices to knowingly do this to prevent over population, potential
strays, etc. With that said Tiger Lilly
now had to be rushed in for emergency surgery (which was very expensive). Tiger Lilly did in fact lose her kittens but
she was spared and able to go home. I
was completely outraged at the thought of this being a possibility. If this was as a result to the vaccination
they gave her I find it difficult to believe that their motives were not a
direct act to terminate her pregnancy.
To me this is very morally wrong and rather upsetting. Whether Tiger Lilly was a stray or a now
adopted kitten didn’t my sister have a say in the matter? Didn’t Tiger Lilly? Either way, I’m so proud of my sister for
what she did. She took in a stray kitten
and her babies and then had to pay for an unexpected emergency surgery out of
love and kindness for the new member of her family. She’s remarkable in my eyes and never for one
second did she want to back out of any of it like someone else had.
While I'm sure that it does happen, I am very skeptical of whether this vaccination-during-pregnancy technique happens too often for several reasons. First of all, many human doctors lack basic information, particularly the old (went to school madd long time ago) and the newbies. One time a guy gave me amoxocillin for Lyme disease (which can make it worse), and later, another guy told me I had parasites when I had a common detox reaction (the six hundred dollar tests came back negative). I'm sure that this type of incompetence is only magnified when it comes to vetrinarians, since they have to treat different species, breeds, etc.
ReplyDeleteSecondly, I think that intentionally feigning incompetent behavior for the sake of fighting overpopulation is probably ineffective, since they kittens are going to belong to an owner who is responsible enough to at least visit the vet. Finally, and most obviously, there is a serious legal risk for the vetrinarian. This creates an interesting question however- if somebody commits an immoral act for a moral cause, does it lessen the badness of the act?